In partnership with
Churn happens.
It’s a normal part of running of business.
But here’s what most GTM teams don’t talk about:
They treat churned customers like they’re gone for good.
And then spin their wheels trying to replace them with net-new accounts.
The hidden pipeline most teams ignore
Let’s put some numbers to this.
For most mid-market and enterprise SaaS companies, annual churn sits around 4–5% (source).
That doesn’t sound like much until you translate it:
• $25M ARR → ~$1M lost per year
• $50M ARR → ~$2–3M lost per year
• $100M ARR → ~$4–5M lost per year
That’s not churn.
That’s revenue that already existed… and walked out the door.
The first question is always “what’s our churn rate?”
But we never ask: How much of that can we win back?
What we saw at Movable Ink
We had the same situation most companies have.
A list of churned customers.
Some from COVID.
Some more recent.
All largely ignored.
Every once in a while, Sales or SDRs would go back to one of those accounts and try to re-engage them.
And when they did, something interesting happened.
Conversion rates were 2–3x higher than what we saw with net-new accounts.
Not surprising when you think about it.
These companies already:
• Knew who we were
• Understood the product
• Had a reason to buy at one point
The problem wasn’t Sales or SDR performance.
The problem was we weren’t doing it consistently.
What changed when we treated it like ABM
Once we made churned customers a core ABM segment, everything changed.
We built a structured approach:
• Segment accounts by reason for churn
• Prioritize based on recency and deal size
• Align with SDRs on who to go after and why
• Build messaging around what actually caused the churn
Instead of random outreach, it became a coordinated motion.
Within three months:
• $2M+ in pipeline generated
Within six months:
• $1M+ in revenue closed
Same accounts. Same product. Different approach.
Why this works
Most win-back efforts fail because they’re just too generic.
Blast the same ads to everyone.
One-size-fits-all messaging.
Zero context around why the customer left.
But when you segment churned accounts properly, results look very different.
Well-structured win-back efforts can convert in the low-teens to mid-20% range, versus low single digits for generic campaigns (source).
And more broadly:
Selling to existing or known customers has a 60–70% success rate, compared to 5–20% for net-new prospects (source) .
You’re not starting from zero.
You’re continuing a conversation that already happened.
Where this fits in your ABM strategy
Most ABM programs focus on:
Cold net-new accounts
Relying only on third-party data
Blasting 1,000’s of accounts with ads
But churned customers are one of the highest-intent segments you can build around.
If you’re thinking about account selection right now, this should be part of your core strategy. Not an afterthought.
Because at the end of the day you already paid to acquire those customers once, and ignoring them is one of the most expensive decisions you can make.
ABM Consulting Now Available!
Are you building or refreshing your ABM strategy, but not sure where to start? I’m now offering limited spots for ABM consulting services to help you get your ABM strategy in the right place to be successful.
This is a low-cost, high-reward offer for your team to build a strategy that works and makes an impact, this year.
Simply fill out this form with your details and we’ll schedule time to talk soon!
For more details on ABM Tactics consulting services, click here.
